Mandatory Remembrance Day, Regulated

OK, it is safely two days after Remembrance Day

Since nobody ever remembers Remembrance Day except on Remembrance Day, now is, perhaps, a better time to reflect on the shared moral code that underlies the institution.  This is the moral code that moves citizens to sacrifice their lives, health, and property.  

We certainly know such a moral code existed at one time.  Otherwise, the institution would not exist as it does with national ceremony and established rituals.  This moral code also manifests in other institutions.

Presumably, part of the institution is reflection upon this shared moral code.  As in a few moments of silence to remember the death, dismemberment, maiming, and trauma of those that sacrificed themselves.  

So, firstly, there does not seem to be much of a shared moral code.  As in, nobody much gives a steaming turd for Remembrance Day.  Do I need to back this up with links and references?  For those concerned with the shared moral code, no, I do not.  As for those operatives who embrace the steaming turd, perhaps they are better served by a few scoops of trans turd awareness.  

There is no shared moral code in Canada.  I would draw your attention to two events that happened this particular Remembrance Day.  I would link to both articles provided by a wikipedia approved truth speaker, but see footnote (1).  

One event was the leaders of our country arriving late, the other is the evil anti-vaxxers disrupting a Remembrance Day ceremony in Kelowna, British Columbia.  

How to associate this with a shared moral code that moves citizens to sacrifice?  

The leader was late.  Hmmm.  Our past shared moral code disapproved of 'being late'.  Obviously,  either 'being late' is now acceptable behaviour, or the report is false news.  If you believe the report, then, well being late is OK, now, in the present shared moral code.  It was not in the past, and was an ugly violation of the past moral code.  Makes the leaders look bad, small, incompetent, like a minstrel show pretending to be an orchestra.  However, the leaders cannot be bad, so the shared moral code has changed.  Being late is OK!  

The leader was not late ... it was False news.  Our past moral code did not embrace false news no more than stepping in a steaming turd was good news.  False news used to be described in negative terms like propaganda, libel, and bullshit.  Now, propaganda, libel, and bullshit are termed false news.  If you strongly feel that this 'leaders arriving late' is false news, then you must accept the premise that our past moral code has changed as well.

So, it is safe to conclude that our shared moral code of today is different from the shared moral code of yesterday.  And that is worth contemplating, is it not, in a moment of silence?

Such irresistable logic demands further analysis.  I am full of questions.  I self identify as a journalist, so Who, What, Where, When, Why...

Who gets to change the moral code?  See footnote (5).

What the heck is the new moral code?  See footnote (6).

Where are the boundaries of the new moral code? See footnote (7).

When moral codes were changed in the past, what happened?  See footnote (8).

Why did the Who change the What?  See footnote (9). 

You can provide your answers on the secret, members only comment section.

Footnotes.  

(1) Here at Mitchieville, we strongly support the nation's national broadcaster.  So much so that we avoid giving them clicks, shun their advertisers, and actively embrace the dark ecomomy so as to deny revenue to the aforesaid nation's national broadcaster.  Until such time as all persons (2) involved with the blah blah blah broadcaster are publically identified (3) as vaxed (4), well, their windpipe is closed for business.

(2) This includes past and present staff, contractors, fellow travellers, and/or rough sex partners.

(3) Public display would embrace a collective set of individual acknowledgement videos of each and every person [see footnote 2] along with effective contact information, financial metrics, and detailed dating history.

(4) Vaxed here refers to whatever status the vax campaign is at in the time you, the reader, read the article.  This is to embrace the ongoing addition of yet more boosters.  In general, it also includes whatever compliance driven by crisis campaign the blah blah blah broadcaster is campaigning for.  Which is to say, they gotta do what they say; otherwise, no pay.  

(5) Much bloodshed has occured over changes to shared moral codes in the past. The historical record shows clearly a reduced life span for moral code programmers. Investigate Irish history for examples. Sometimes, the answer is No.

(6)  The current shared moral code is in dispute.  It also appears to be constantly changing, as if it was the work of a drama teacher talking to a captive audience of school children, rather than an O'Neill chieftain addressing a clan of steel in hand libertarians.

(7) The current shared moral code does not appear to be uniform, consistent, or rational.  It appears to be an exercise in manipulation by cynical elites, in pursuit of money (at best) or some fantasy that would be better left for a drug sodden debauch at the Spahn ranch.  This uniform lack of rational consistence increases the probability of social unrest [see footnote 5].

(8) Since social unrest can descend below mostly peaceful, self preservation calls for some depth of knowlege here.  An example: such is the zeal of men to complete the training for the elite American Navy Seals, that among the many who fail is a valiant minority willing to have themselves castrated in order to try again.  While this is no surprise to American Marines, it is to the rest of us. In general, how many are unreasonably unwilling to castrate themselves; how many enjoy castration porn during lockdown? 

(9) It sure would be nice to know who in Starfleet command decided to encourage castration as career guidance.  When we know who they are, their leadership by example will do much to address the mounting mostly peaceful protest.  I am confident that the why of it all will spill from their lips as it is drawn and logically quartered.

Disclaimer:  This is an extract from a research paper titled Article Adjective Subject Adverb Verb Object Preposition Gerund Phrase.  

I, Fenris Badwulf, wrote this.  I care.

You can help me help you.  Send me your money.